The “Paracas Skulls” as they're known, discovered in 1928, have always been a point of speculation and controversy. Now, an unnamed geneticist is claiming the skulls are not related to anything known to humanity.

According to ADG (UK) Blog

"It had mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA) with mutations unknown in any human, primate, or animal known so far. But a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample indicate that if these mutations will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans."

A man by the name of Brien Foerster claims he sent samples from the skulls to a geneticist who has done work with the US government. He says these elongated skulls are, basically, the skulls of aliens.

Now, I'm all for these being aliens skulls. Why not. However, Brien Foerster works for a Peruvian tour company apparently, so that's red flag for me. Also, the geneticist who is claiming these skulls have nothing to do with the human race in any way is UNNAMED. Another red flag for me.

I want to know WHY ancient people did this sort of binding to their skulls. Was it simply just something they thought looked good, or were they trying to look like something they'd seen?

I'll keep you posted if anything official ever gets published to any scientific journal...until then, talk amongst yourselves...

Marcin Tlustochowicz/